<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great Encyclopedia Choices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donnadesroches.ca/2007/03/05/great-encyclopedia-choices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donnadesroches.ca/2007/03/05/great-encyclopedia-choices/</link>
	<description>Learning and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 21:53:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Wall</title>
		<link>http://donnadesroches.ca/2007/03/05/great-encyclopedia-choices/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Wall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 02:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classroomtechtips.wordpress.com/2007/03/05/great-encyclopedia-choices/#comment-19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comparison and usage guidelines for these three resources, Donna. But I have to add my opinion (for whatever it is worth) regarding your analysis of Wikipedia when you say that &quot;... it also means that the information can be incorrect at any point in time&quot;. I agree with you on this, but I&#039;d also point out that one could say the same thing about the other two encyclopedias (or any encyclopedia). I know we&#039;ve had these conversations before, but I think it&#039;s an interesting conversation and one that is worth discussing.

Heather Ross and I had an interesting discussion about Wikipedia on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://edtechposse.ca/?q=wikipedia_writers_for_hire_and_the_stupidity_of_crowds&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EdTech Posse Podcast 2.5&lt;/a&gt;. (How&#039;s that for blatant self-promotion?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comparison and usage guidelines for these three resources, Donna. But I have to add my opinion (for whatever it is worth) regarding your analysis of Wikipedia when you say that &#8220;&#8230; it also means that the information can be incorrect at any point in time&#8221;. I agree with you on this, but I&#8217;d also point out that one could say the same thing about the other two encyclopedias (or any encyclopedia). I know we&#8217;ve had these conversations before, but I think it&#8217;s an interesting conversation and one that is worth discussing.</p>
<p>Heather Ross and I had an interesting discussion about Wikipedia on the <a href="http://edtechposse.ca/?q=wikipedia_writers_for_hire_and_the_stupidity_of_crowds" rel="nofollow">EdTech Posse Podcast 2.5</a>. (How&#8217;s that for blatant self-promotion?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

